Blog
SPM Mathematics: How to Master Linear Inequalities in Two Variables
This chapter is graphs plus regions: draw the boundary line, decide which side to shade, and translate word problems into a system of inequalities.
Solid line or dashed line
The boundary line is solid when the inequality is greater-or-equal or less-or-equal, and dashed when it is strictly greater or less, because a dashed line means the points on it are not included. After drawing the line, test a simple point such as the origin to decide which side satisfies the inequality, then shade that region.
Getting the line style wrong is an easy mark to drop.
Turn the words into inequalities
The harder marks come from writing the inequalities yourself: at least 20 becomes greater-or-equal to 20, no more than becomes less-or-equal, and two conditions together become a system. List each condition in words first, then convert it, so you do not lose a constraint.
The shaded overlap of all the regions is the answer they want.
Boundary lines that only involve one variable
Not every boundary line has a slope, an inequality like x > 2 or y ≤ 5 still needs a full line drawn on the same set of axes, just a vertical or horizontal one instead of a diagonal one. For x > 2, the boundary is the vertical line through x = 2, and the shaded region is everything to one side of it, regardless of the y-value; for y ≤ 5, the boundary is horizontal through y = 5, and shading runs above or below it.
Students sometimes try to plot these as if they need two variables to define the line, which only wastes time, one coordinate is enough to place a vertical or horizontal boundary correctly.
Combining several inequalities into one region
A typical question gives two or three inequalities together and asks for the single region that satisfies all of them at once, usually labelled R. The clean way to build this is to shade each inequality's unwanted side lightly with its own light shading or hatching, one inequality at a time, so that the region left completely unshaded, satisfying every inequality simultaneously, becomes visually obvious.
Shading the wanted side directly for each inequality instead often produces overlapping shading that is hard to read back correctly.
Reading the answer back out of a shaded diagram
Some questions work in reverse, giving you a shaded region and asking you to state the inequalities that define it. Work one boundary line at a time: find its equation from two points or its gradient and intercept, then check whether the shaded region lies above or below that line to decide the direction of the inequality, and finally check whether the line itself is included (solid, so ≤ or ≥) or excluded (dashed, so < or >) before writing the final inequality.
Frequently asked questions
Which point should I use to test the region if the origin lies on the line?
Choose any other convenient point not on the line, such as (1, 0) or (0, 1), and substitute it into the inequality the same way.
How many inequalities does a typical combined-region question use?
Usually two or three inequalities together, often including simple ones like x ≥ 0 or y ≥ 0 to restrict the region to a particular part of the graph.
Do I need a ruler and careful scale for this topic?
Yes, an accurate scale and a ruled boundary line matter here just as they do for other graph-drawing chapters, since a slightly wrong line can shift the entire shaded region.